Introduction
The evolution of criminal procedure in India has reached a turning point with the transition from the CrPC, 1973, to the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. At the heart of this legislative shift lies the law of bail, a mechanism designed to balance the imperative of effective law enforcement with the constitutional guarantee of personal liberty under Article 21. While the BNSS introduces reformative provisions, such as relaxation for first-time offenders, it simultaneously expands police powers through segmented remand architectures and broad preventive detention authorities. This analysis explores the judicial recalibrations and statutory nuances that define the current bail regime, critically examining the emerging doctrine of carceral justice.
Jurisprudential Foundations and Historical Context
The concept of bail is rooted in the fundamental principle of the presumption of innocence, ensuring that an individual is not subjected to punitive detention before a finding of guilt. Historically, bail emerged as a way to facilitate the release of a person from legal custody into the hands of sureties, who undertook to produce the accused at trial. In India, these practices evolved from the 17th-century accounts of sureties under the Mughal and British systems to the codified CrPC of 1973.
Modern Indian bail jurisprudence is deeply rooted in the golden triangle of the constitution, Articles 14, 19, and 21, which ensure procedure depriving a person of liberty must be just, fair, and reasonable. The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that bail is the rule, jail is the exception, a mantra intended to prevent pre-trial detention from becoming a form of surrogate punishment.
The Statutory Framework: Rights and Discretion
Bailable Offences and Mandatory Release
Section 2(a) of the CrPC, as reflected in the BNSS, defines bailable offences as those where the grant of bail is mandatory. Once the accused is prepared to furnish the required bond, the police or magistrate has no authority to deny release. The Supreme Court in Rasiklal v. Kishore clarified that the language of section 436 is imperative. Magistrates cannot exercise discretion if the accused is ready to provide surety. Furthermore, section 50 of CrPC imposes a mandatory duty on the police to inform arrested persons of their right to bail, a critical safeguard to legally unaware.
Non-Bailable Offences and Judicial Principles
IN these types of cases, bail is a discretionary power guided by codified principles. Section 437 of the CrPC and Section 480 of bnss outline that bail should generally be refused if there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused has committed an offence punishable by death or life imprisonment. However, humanitarian exceptions are carved out for women, children under sixteen, and the sick or infirm. Courts have to balance several factors while exercising these discretions, like:
The severity of the crime and the strength of the evidence
The likelihood of the accused absconding
The risk of influencing witnesses and destroying evidence.
Ensuring that the bail is not denied solely due to poverty or inability to pay
Anticipatory Bail: Shielding Against Malice
Section 438 in crpc and Section 482 in the BNSS talk about the anticipatory bail that allows individuals to seek protection in anticipation of arrest. Introduced to prevent the misuse of arrest for political vendettas, the Supreme Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibba v. State of Punjab held that this power protects personal liberty against motivated complaints. The BNSS recently removed the requirement for a seven-day notice to the Public Prosecutor, granting courts wider discretion, though it now expressly prohibits anticipatory bail for aggravated forms of rape against minors.
The Moti Ram Test: Roots in the Society
A significant contribution is the roots in the society test from Motiram v. State of Madhya Pradesh, Justice Krishna Iyer argued that bail should be a sociological assessment rather than a purely monetary one. Factors include the accused’s stable residence, employment, family ties, and the willingness of the responsible community members to vouch for them. This approach is vital in India, where heavy monetary sureties often lead to mechanical detention for the poor, who remain incarcerated despite being presumed innocent.
BNSS Reforms: Leniency vs. Expansion of Power
Section 479 BNSS: The First-Time Offender Reform
Section 479 replaces section 436A of CrPC, introducing a one-third ground that allows first-time offenders, those who were never previously convicted, to be released on bail after serving one-third of their maximum sentence. This is a progressive shift from the CrPC’s “halfway” rule. However, section 479(2) contains a non-obstante clause that prohibits this release if the person has multiple pending cases. Critiques argue that this is arbitrary, as it treats all persons with multiple accusations as higher risks, potentially excluding a vast number of undertrials who may be victims of “Over-charging” or frivolous FIRs.
Segmented Remand and Section 187
This might be the most controversial change in the remand procedure under section 187. Under the CRrPC, as per CBI v. Anupam Kulkarni, the police custody was limited to the first fifteen days of the remand period. The BNSS does not allow the fifteen days of police custody to be authorized “in whole or in part” at any time during the initial forty or sixty days of investigation. This staggered remand architecture means an accused can be moved between judicial and police custody multiple times, creating a chilling effect on bail strategies and increasing the risk of custodial pressure.
Preventive Detention and Handcuffing
Section 172 of the BNSS grants the police the power to detain or remove persons who disregard lawful directions given for preventive duties. The vagueness of lawful directions raises concerns that the provision could be used to suppress dissent or peaceful protests. Similarly, Section 43(3) of the BNSS now provides legal sanction for handcuffing repeat offenders or those involved in serious crimes like terrorism. This marks a regressive shift from Prem Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration, where the Supreme Court held that routine handcuffing is “prima facie inhuman” and violates the right to dignity under Section 21.
Case References and Recent Judicial Recalibrations
Mihir Rajesh Shah v. The State of Maharashtra (2025)
In November 2025, the Supreme Court of India addressed the mandatory requirement of informing an arrested person of the grounds of their arrest. The court held that Article 22(1) is a mandatory constitutional safeguard, not a mere formality. It establishes the “two-hour rule,” requiring written grounds of arrest to be furnished in a language the arrestee understands at least two hours before production of remand. Non-compliance renders the arrest and subsequent detention illegal.
Special Statutes and Article 21
The court has also addressed stringent bail provisions in the PMLA and UAPA. In Senthil Balaji v. State, the court emphasized that statutory restrictions, such as “twin conditions”, cannot justify indefinite incarceration without trial. If there is “no prospect of the trial commencing,” the constitutional promise of liberty under Article 21 must prevail. This ensures that special laws do not become tools for surrogate punishments.
Sociological Impact and Statistical Reality
The practical functioning of bail laws reveals a crisis of overcrowding and systematic bias. NCRB statistics for 2022-2023 show that 77.9% all prisoners in India are undertrials, with an overcrowding rate being 133%. 49% of the undertrials prisoners belong to the age group of 18-30. Marginalized communities are disproportionately represented among undertrials, often due to an inability to furnish sureties, a problem the Moti Ram Test specifically sought to cure. Furthermore, 14.6% of undertrials have spent 1 to 2 years in custody, and 2.6% have spent more than 5 years without conviction. While digital tools like FASTER and N-STEP have improved the transmission of bail orders, judicial delays remain a structural barrier.
Critical Analysis and Recommendations
The transition of BNSS represents a broader shift from “Carceral Justice”, a philosophy where detention becomes the default and liberty the hard-won privilege. While the law aims for nyay(justice), the expansion of police discretion risks the undermining of the presumption of innocence.
Recommendations for policy
Magistrate must demand necessity-based reasoning for staggered custody under section 187, ensuring it remains an exception.
Section 479(2) should be amended to exclude minor or overlapping charges so that statutory bail is not rendered illusory for the poor.
Written grounds of arrest must be institutionalized across all police departments to ensure constitutional accountability.
The routine use of handcuffs under section 43(3) should be subject to immediate judicial review to prevent the stigmatization of the accused.
Schemes like LADCS should be fully implemented to identify and assist prisoners eligible for release under the new BNSS provisions.
At last, the legitimacy of the justice system depends on upholding the principle that liberty is not a concession but a constitutional guarantee. The BNSS must be interpreted through the lens of constitutional humanism to ensure that investigative efficiency does not come at the cost of fundamental rights.
Citations
Judicial Academy, Jharkhand. (2025). BAIL — COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CRPC, 1973 AND BNSS, 2023. https:jajharkhand.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Bail-Reading-Material-Web-.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Kumar, B., & Makkar, Dr. A. K. (2021). LAW RELATING TO BAIL IN INDIA: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS. International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity, 12(5), 141. https:www.irjmsh.com
Jeya Murugan. (2025, September). BAIL OR JAIL? ASSESSING THE RISE OF CARCERAL JUSTICE IN INDIA’S BNSS FRAMEWORK https:www.researchgate.net/publication/395893991_BAIL_OR_JAIL_ASSESSING_THE_RISE_OF_CARCERAL_JUSTICE_IN_INDIA'S_BNSS_FRAMEWORK
Maniyar, Z., & Maniyar, Z. (2025, August 18). Liberty under Siege: Reclaiming the right to a speedy trial from the grip of special laws. CJP. https:cjp.org.in/liberty-under-siege-reclaiming-the-right-to-speedy-trial-from-the-grip--special-laws/
Grounds of Arrest - a constitutional safeguard incorporated under the BNSS, 2023 - KSR & Co - Company Secretaries. (2025, December 16). KSR & Co - Company Secretaries. https:ksrandco.in/publications/grounds-of-arrest-a-constitution-safeguard-and-more-incorporated-under-the-bnss-2023/
Grounds of Arrest - a constitutional safeguard incorporated under the BNSS, 2023 - KSR & Co - Company Secretaries. (2025, December 16). KSR & Co - Company Secretaries. https:ksrandco.in/publications/grounds-of-arrest-a-constitution-safeguard-and-more-incorporated-under-the-bnss-2023/
S.Bhargavi, Smt. (n.d.). PROTECTION OF LIFE AND PERSONAL LIBERTY-CAUTIOUS APPROACH BY COURTS OF MAGISTRATES AND SPECIAL SESSIONS JUDGES.
Objectives and scope of bail under BNSS, 2023 An In-Depth Analysis - International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS). (2025, July 10). International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS). https:rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/articles/objectives-and-scope-of-bail-under-bnss-2023-an-in-depth-analysis/
Legal, V. (2025, March 1). EVOLUTION OF BAIL LAW: FROM CRPC TO BNSS. Vintage Legal. https:www.vintagelegalvl.com/post/evolution-of-bail-law-from-crpc-to-bnss
Admin. (2024, December 27). Getz Cables Pvt. Ltd. vs. SBI: Can Filing a Section 10 Petition After SARFAESI Act Actions Be Fraudulent or Malicious? Kings & Alliance LLP. https:knallp.com/supreme-court-settles-the-applicability-of-section-479-of-bnss-to-pmla-prosecutions-badshah-majid-malik-vs-ed/
Retrospective application of Section 479 BNSS: a crucial step forward in alleviating prison overcrowding or two steps back? (2024, November 13). NUALS Law Journal. https:nualslawjournal.com/2024/11/13/retrospective-application-of-section-479-bnss-a-crucial-step-forward-in-alleviating-prison-overcrowding-or-two-steps-back/
Maniyar, Z., & Maniyar, Z. (2025a, January 7). Police custody under CrPC & BNSS: A paradigm shift in balancing liberty and investigation. CJP. https:cjp.org.in/police-custody-under-crpc-bnss-a-paradigm-shift-in-balancing-liberty-and-investigation/
Masih, C., & Rathi, A. (2025). Provisions Related to Arrest and Police Custody under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Adhiniyam, 2023: A Critical Appraisal. In International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews (Vol. 6, Issue 11, pp. 4995–5008).
Mahajan, A. B. &. S., & Law, L. (2025, January 15). Handcuffing: necessity or violation of rights? Live Law. https:www.livelaw.in/articles/arrested-person-handcuffing-violation-of-fundamental-rights-supreme-court-judgments-280994
Arora, V. (2024, September 25). Could new criminal laws raise the risk of wrongful arrests? - Newsreel Asia. Newsreel Asia. https:newsreel.asia/articles/could-new-criminal-laws-raise-the-risk-of-wrongful-arrests
numen law offices. (n.d.). Understanding the Scope and Nature of Section 172 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. https:www.numenlaw.com/understanding-the-scope-and-nature-of-section-172-of-the-bhartiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023.php
Sahil Hussain Choudhury. (2025, November 12). The Supreme Court’s ‘grounds of arrest’ ruling and the Grammar of Due Process. The Leaflet. https:theleaflet.in/life-and-liberty/the-supreme-courts-grounds-of-arrest-ruling-and-the-grammar-of-due-process
numen law offices. (n.d.-a). Understanding the Scope and Nature of Section 172 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. https:www.numenlaw.com/understanding-the-scope-and-nature-of-section-172-of-the-bhartiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023.php
Edu Law. (n.d.). https:www.theedulaw.in/content/judgements/290/Arrest-Grounds-must-be-given-in-writing-to-the-accused-otherwise-arrest-illegal-
Landmark Supreme Court Judgments of the year 2024 On Bail (Part 2). (n.d.). https:www.lawweb.in/2024/12/landmark-supreme-court-judgments-of.html
Supreme Court Observer. (2025, November 6). The SC on bail under UAPA and PMLA: a dataset from 2024 and 2025 - Supreme Court Observer. https:www.scobserver.in/journal/the-sc-on-bail-under-uapa-and-pmla-a-dataset-from-2024-and-2025/
Ias, L. (2024, December 2). STATE OF INDIA’S UNDERTRIAL PRISONERS, PLANS TO EASE SENTENCING. Lukmaan IAS. https:blog.lukmaanias.com/2024/12/02/state-of-indias-undertrial-prisoners-plans-to-ease-sentencing/
Deo, M. (2025, December 9). How India’s new criminal laws curb civil liberties | IDR. India Development Review. https:idronline.org/article/rights/how-indias-new-criminal-laws-curb-civil-liberties/
One accusation too many: the chilling effect of BNSS Section 479(2). (2025, December 4). The Crime & Justice Blog. https:crimeandjustice.blog/2025/12/04/one-accusation-too-many-the-chilling-effect-of-bnss-section-4792/