Advocatespedia:In the news/June 29, 2024: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "India has no court of appeal unlike the UK. The Law Commission has, in its 227th report, recommended setting up four regional benches of the Supreme Court in Delhi, Chennai/Hyderabad, Kolkata and Mumbai. However, the Full Court of the Supreme Court has rejected the Law Commission's suggestion for establishing a Constitutional Bench in Delhi and Cassation Benches in the four regions. The Indian Supreme Court hears more than 50,000 cases a year. The UK and US Supreme Cour...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
India has no court of appeal unlike the UK. The Law Commission has, in its 227th report, recommended setting up four regional benches of the Supreme Court in Delhi, Chennai/Hyderabad, Kolkata and Mumbai. However, the Full Court of the Supreme Court has rejected the Law Commission | <div> | ||
<ul> | |||
The Indian Supreme Court hears more than 50,000 cases a year. The UK and US Supreme Courts, on the other hand, hear less than 100 cases a year on average. India, unlike the US, has a unified judicial system. So each State does not have a separate hierarchy of courts that adjudicate state laws. | <li>India has no court of appeal unlike the UK. The Law Commission has, in its 227th report, recommended setting up four regional benches of the Supreme Court in Delhi, Chennai/Hyderabad, Kolkata and Mumbai. However, the Full Court of the Supreme Court has rejected the Law Commission's suggestion for establishing a Constitutional Bench in Delhi and Cassation Benches in the four regions.</li> | ||
<li>The Indian Supreme Court hears more than 50,000 cases a year. The UK and US Supreme Courts, on the other hand, hear less than 100 cases a year on average. India, unlike the US, has a unified judicial system. So each State does not have a separate hierarchy of courts that adjudicate state laws.</li> | |||
Discuss the benefits and demerits of having regional benches for Supreme Courts in India. | <li>Discuss the benefits and demerits of having regional benches for Supreme Courts in India.</li> | ||
</ul> | |||
<!-- | |||
NewPP limit report | |||
Cached time: 20240629165257 | |||
Cache expiry: 86400 | |||
Reduced expiry: false | |||
Complications: | |||
CPU time usage: 0.001 seconds | |||
Real time usage: 0.001 seconds | |||
Preprocessor visited node count: 1/1000000 | |||
Post‐expand include size: 0/2097152 bytes | |||
Template argument size: 0/2097152 bytes | |||
Highest expansion depth: 1/100 | |||
Expensive parser function count: 0/100 | |||
Unstrip recursion depth: 0/20 | |||
Unstrip post‐expand size: 0/5000000 bytes | |||
--><!-- | |||
Transclusion expansion time report | |||
100.00% 0.000 1 -total | |||
--><!-- Saved in parser cache with key aklcwuks_wiki-wiki_:pcache:idhash:248381-0!canonical and timestamp 20240629165257 and revision id 388822. Rendering was triggered because: page-view | |||
--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 22:33, 29 June 2024
- India has no court of appeal unlike the UK. The Law Commission has, in its 227th report, recommended setting up four regional benches of the Supreme Court in Delhi, Chennai/Hyderabad, Kolkata and Mumbai. However, the Full Court of the Supreme Court has rejected the Law Commission's suggestion for establishing a Constitutional Bench in Delhi and Cassation Benches in the four regions.
- The Indian Supreme Court hears more than 50,000 cases a year. The UK and US Supreme Courts, on the other hand, hear less than 100 cases a year on average. India, unlike the US, has a unified judicial system. So each State does not have a separate hierarchy of courts that adjudicate state laws.
- Discuss the benefits and demerits of having regional benches for Supreme Courts in India.