Loopholes in POCSO: Difference between revisions
(Article) |
(Article) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<h1 style="text-align:justify">LOOPHOLES IN THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 = | |||
<h1 style="text-align:justify">LOOPHOLES IN THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 = = | |||
<p style="text-align:justify" ></p> | <p style="text-align:justify" ></p> | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
<p style="text-align:justify">'''INTRODUCTION'''</p> | <p style="text-align:justify">'''INTRODUCTION'''</p> | ||
<p style="text-align:justify">The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012< | <p style="text-align:justify">The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<sup><ref>#cite_note-1 [1]</ref></sup>. The demand for a centralized legislation that protected children was deeply felt during that time in India, because of; the the lacunae left by previous legislations, as well as, the growing rate of crime. This landmark legislation thus aimed at providing a legal framework within which children could reach the doors of justice. The act has been quite successful, however continues to remain bound by its shortcomings.</p> | ||
<p style="text-align:justify"></p> | <p style="text-align:justify"></p> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
<p style="text-align:justify">'''SOLUTIONS PROVIDED'''</p> | <p style="text-align:justify">'''SOLUTIONS PROVIDED'''</p> | ||
<p style="text-align:justify">The act claims to be gender-neutral<ref> | <p style="text-align:justify">The act claims to be gender-neutral<sup><ref>#cite_note-2 [2]</ref></sup>.</p> | ||
<p style="text-align:justify"></p> | <p style="text-align:justify"></p> | ||
<h3 style="text-align:justify">PROCEDURAL DRAWBACKS === | <h3 style="text-align:justify">PROCEDURAL DRAWBACKS === === | ||
<p style="text-align:justify">False cases may also be put through the child to avoid punishment by erasing the possibility of direct liability that is otherwise caused by retracement<ref> | <p style="text-align:justify">False cases may also be put through the child to avoid punishment by erasing the possibility of direct liability that is otherwise caused by retracement<sup><ref>#cite_note-3 [3]</ref></sup>. Though the act tries to deal with certain issues, it cannot remove the innate burdens and issues of Indian courts that have overtime been normalized.</p> | ||
<h3 style="text-align:justify"> === | <h3 style="text-align:justify">=== === | ||
<h3 style="text-align:justify">ISSUES MATERIALIZED === | <h3 style="text-align:justify">ISSUES MATERIALIZED === === | ||
<p style="text-align:justify">Among these issues, delays and inconsistencies with evidence have been “accepted”. Without adequate protection of witnesses, the conviction rate further reduces. Interim compensation has not been awarded in a timely fashion. Even final compensation | <p style="text-align:justify">Among these issues, delays and inconsistencies with evidence have been “accepted”. Without adequate protection of witnesses, the conviction rate further reduces. Interim compensation has not been awarded in a timely fashion. Even final compensation is dependent on the whims and fancies of judges<sup><ref>#cite_note-4 [4]</ref></sup> is not only contrary to principles of law but also justifies unfair treatment by the law towards its subjects. The chain of command is not established by this act thus leading to a lack of accountability as no one person holds the responsibility of ensuring justice. This harms not only the victim but also, the accused in cases of false charges or statutory rape. Lack of protection to both parties equally is problematic because lack of punishment for retracement by children allows false cases to become a tool of societal gain . Further, by restricting the scope of the act to only biological, and not mental, age of the victim reduces the option of recourse for several persons. Additionally, after crossing all these hurdles, when the case reaches the court, efficient and capable lawyers are required . The implications of letting these issues remain in our legislation allows for judicial injustice.</p> | ||
<p style="text-align:justify"></p> | <p style="text-align:justify"></p> | ||
<h3 style="text-align:justify">CONCLUSION === | <h3 style="text-align:justify">CONCLUSION === === | ||
<p style="text-align:justify">Although the act solves several problems that it aimed to, it is still rife with numerous issues. With its 46 provisions that increase scope of protection, the act seems to be the ideal as, inter alia, it solves the issue of ambiguous definitions. However, using a critical lens would help see the problems in this centralized legislation. These seemingly innumerable barriers make regulation by the required authorities on this issue even more pressing. Public trust in law and order is to be upheld by creating and introducing reforms . These issues cannot go unchecked as they not only injure the physical and mental state of victims but also the innocent accused and the true perpetrator; society.</p> | |||
= = | |||
*<ref>http://ibid" rel="nofollow http://ibid</ref> <sup>3</sup> | |||
*<ref>https://www.clearias.com/pocso-act/#:~:text=Under%20POCSO%2C%20the%20consent%20of%20a%20person%20under,that%20any%20sex%20with%20a%20minor%20is%20rape" rel="nofollow https://www.clearias.com/pocso-act/#:~:text=Under%20POCSO%2C%20the%20consent%20of%20a%20person%20under,that%20any%20sex%20with%20a%20minor%20is%20rape</ref>. <sup>6</sup> | |||
*<ref>https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2020/05/mayank-tiwari-posco-act/#:~:text=Loopholes%20in%20the%20Act%20Upon%20a%20preliminary%20reading,possibility%20of%20consent%20given%20by%20persons%20under%2018" rel="nofollow https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2020/05/mayank-tiwari-posco-act/#:~:text=Loopholes%20in%20the%20Act%20Upon%20a%20preliminary%20reading,possibility%20of%20consent%20given%20by%20persons%20under%2018</ref>. <sup>9</sup> | |||
*<ref>https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence" rel="nofollow https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence</ref> <sup>11</sup> | |||
<!-- | |||
NewPP limit report | NewPP limit report | ||
Cached time: | Cached time: 20240629170947 | ||
Cache expiry: 86400 | Cache expiry: 86400 | ||
Reduced expiry: false | Reduced expiry: false | ||
Complications: | Complications: | ||
CPU time usage: 0. | CPU time usage: 0.015 seconds | ||
Real time usage: 0. | Real time usage: 0.016 seconds | ||
Preprocessor visited node count: | Preprocessor visited node count: 52/1000000 | ||
Post‐expand include size: 0/2097152 bytes | Post‐expand include size: 0/2097152 bytes | ||
Template argument size: 0/2097152 bytes | Template argument size: 0/2097152 bytes | ||
Highest expansion depth: | Highest expansion depth: 2/100 | ||
Expensive parser function count: 0/100 | Expensive parser function count: 0/100 | ||
Unstrip recursion depth: 0/20 | Unstrip recursion depth: 0/20 | ||
Unstrip post‐expand size: | Unstrip post‐expand size: 664/5000000 bytes | ||
--><!-- | --><!-- | ||
Transclusion expansion time report | Transclusion expansion time report | ||
100.00% 0.000 1 -total | 100.00% 0.000 1 -total | ||
--> | --><!-- Saved in parser cache with key aklcwuks_wiki-wiki_:pcache:idhash:142423-0!canonical and timestamp 20240629170947 and revision id 229237. Rendering was triggered because: api-parse | ||
--> | |||
[[Category:Article]] | [[Category:Article]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:39, 29 June 2024
LOOPHOLES IN THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 = =
INTRODUCTION
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012[1]. The demand for a centralized legislation that protected children was deeply felt during that time in India, because of; the the lacunae left by previous legislations, as well as, the growing rate of crime. This landmark legislation thus aimed at providing a legal framework within which children could reach the doors of justice. The act has been quite successful, however continues to remain bound by its shortcomings.
SOLUTIONS PROVIDED
The act claims to be gender-neutral[2].
PROCEDURAL DRAWBACKS === ===
False cases may also be put through the child to avoid punishment by erasing the possibility of direct liability that is otherwise caused by retracement[3]. Though the act tries to deal with certain issues, it cannot remove the innate burdens and issues of Indian courts that have overtime been normalized.
=== ===
ISSUES MATERIALIZED === ===
Among these issues, delays and inconsistencies with evidence have been “accepted”. Without adequate protection of witnesses, the conviction rate further reduces. Interim compensation has not been awarded in a timely fashion. Even final compensation is dependent on the whims and fancies of judges[4] is not only contrary to principles of law but also justifies unfair treatment by the law towards its subjects. The chain of command is not established by this act thus leading to a lack of accountability as no one person holds the responsibility of ensuring justice. This harms not only the victim but also, the accused in cases of false charges or statutory rape. Lack of protection to both parties equally is problematic because lack of punishment for retracement by children allows false cases to become a tool of societal gain . Further, by restricting the scope of the act to only biological, and not mental, age of the victim reduces the option of recourse for several persons. Additionally, after crossing all these hurdles, when the case reaches the court, efficient and capable lawyers are required . The implications of letting these issues remain in our legislation allows for judicial injustice.
CONCLUSION === ===
Although the act solves several problems that it aimed to, it is still rife with numerous issues. With its 46 provisions that increase scope of protection, the act seems to be the ideal as, inter alia, it solves the issue of ambiguous definitions. However, using a critical lens would help see the problems in this centralized legislation. These seemingly innumerable barriers make regulation by the required authorities on this issue even more pressing. Public trust in law and order is to be upheld by creating and introducing reforms . These issues cannot go unchecked as they not only injure the physical and mental state of victims but also the innocent accused and the true perpetrator; society.
- ↑ #cite_note-1 [1]
- ↑ #cite_note-2 [2]
- ↑ #cite_note-3 [3]
- ↑ #cite_note-4 [4]
- ↑ http://ibid" rel="nofollow http://ibid
- ↑ https://www.clearias.com/pocso-act/#:~:text=Under%20POCSO%2C%20the%20consent%20of%20a%20person%20under,that%20any%20sex%20with%20a%20minor%20is%20rape" rel="nofollow https://www.clearias.com/pocso-act/#:~:text=Under%20POCSO%2C%20the%20consent%20of%20a%20person%20under,that%20any%20sex%20with%20a%20minor%20is%20rape
- ↑ https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2020/05/mayank-tiwari-posco-act/#:~:text=Loopholes%20in%20the%20Act%20Upon%20a%20preliminary%20reading,possibility%20of%20consent%20given%20by%20persons%20under%2018" rel="nofollow https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2020/05/mayank-tiwari-posco-act/#:~:text=Loopholes%20in%20the%20Act%20Upon%20a%20preliminary%20reading,possibility%20of%20consent%20given%20by%20persons%20under%2018
- ↑ https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence" rel="nofollow https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence
- ↑ #cite_note-1 [1]
- ↑ #cite_note-2 [2]
- ↑ #cite_note-3 [3]
- ↑ #cite_note-4 [4]
- ↑ http://ibid" rel="nofollow http://ibid
- ↑ https://www.clearias.com/pocso-act/#:~:text=Under%20POCSO%2C%20the%20consent%20of%20a%20person%20under,that%20any%20sex%20with%20a%20minor%20is%20rape" rel="nofollow https://www.clearias.com/pocso-act/#:~:text=Under%20POCSO%2C%20the%20consent%20of%20a%20person%20under,that%20any%20sex%20with%20a%20minor%20is%20rape
- ↑ https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2020/05/mayank-tiwari-posco-act/#:~:text=Loopholes%20in%20the%20Act%20Upon%20a%20preliminary%20reading,possibility%20of%20consent%20given%20by%20persons%20under%2018" rel="nofollow https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2020/05/mayank-tiwari-posco-act/#:~:text=Loopholes%20in%20the%20Act%20Upon%20a%20preliminary%20reading,possibility%20of%20consent%20given%20by%20persons%20under%2018
- ↑ https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence" rel="nofollow https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence