COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL, CALCUTTA V. HINDUSTAN HOUSING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT TRUST LIMITED INSC 151; AIR 1986 SC 1805; 1986 SCR 390; 1986 SCC 641; 1986 JT 2; 1986 SCALE 142

From Advocatespedia
Revision as of 23:32, 2 July 2024 by 8247521077305041206345 (talk | contribs) (Supreme Court Of India Cases)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Khan Bahadur Ahmed Alladin & Sons (supra) and Topandas Kundanmal (supra) were relied on by the Gujarat High Court in Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat v. New Jehangir Vakil Mills Co. Ltd., [1979] 117 I.T.R. 849 for reaffirming that it was on the final determination of the amount of compensation that the right to such income in the nature of compensation would arise or accrue and till then there was no liability in praesenti in respect of the additional amount of compensation claimed by the owner of the land.

It is unnecessary to refer to all the cases cited before us. It is sufficient to point out that there is a clear distinction between cases such as the present one, where the right to receive payment is in dispute and it is not a question of merely quantifying the amount to be received, and cases where the right to receive payment is admitted and the quantification only of the amount payable is left to be determined in accordance with settled or accepted principles. We are of opinion that the High Court is right in the view taken by it and, therefore, this appeal must be dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs.