AHMED HUSSAIN KHAN V. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH INSC 184; AIR 1984 SC 1855; 1985 SCR 908; 1984 Suppl.SCC 467; 1984 SCALE 561

Ahmed Hussain Khan v. State of Andhra Pradesh Ahmed Hussain Khan, a public servant, faced disciplinary action that could include suspension or dismissal from service. He challenged this action, claiming it was unjust and violated his rights.

The case underscores the importance of the principles of natural justice, which require that an individual be given a fair hearing before any adverse action is taken against them. The court examines whether the procedure followed by the administrative authorities was fair and lawful. This includes whether proper notice was given and if the employee was allowed to defend themselves adequately. This case reflects the scope of judicial review in administrative matters, where courts assess whether decisions made by public authorities were within their powers and complied with legal standards. 

The court typically rules in favour of upholding the principles of natural justice. It may order the reinstatement of Ahmed Hussain Khan if it finds that the disciplinary action was unjustified or that due process was not followed. This sets a precedent regarding the treatment of public servants and reinforces the requirement for administrative bodies to conduct fair and transparent proceedings. The case serves as an important reference point in administrative law, emphasizing that public officials must adhere to fair practices when taking disciplinary actions. It protects the rights of employees and ensures accountability in government actions.